Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. pvt sale - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
pvt sale
- by Cr Turist - at 2016.05.30 07:01:12
|
2. To:CCP - An Appeal from a long standing player - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
OK so people said roaming pvp was dead, supers were to op, and sov was to hard to take. so CCP came up with jump changes, new sov, and with the combination of these the hope to encourage more small gang pvp. the problem here is when you neuter s...
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.08.18 09:31:16
|
3. Scaled Loot Drops? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Why not scale loot drop rates by how many people of certain ships are on the mail. Example. A solo t3 destroyer kills a T1 cruiser 50% drop of mods and items in cargo of the cruiser. 2 t3 destroyers kill a T2 battle ships 90% drop of mods and i...
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.06.29 19:57:35
|
4. Sticky:[Aegis] More balance! - Ishtars, DDAs and the Tempest - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
and to not buff the TFI is dumb.
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.06.22 15:50:10
|
5. Sticky:[Aegis] More balance! - Ishtars, DDAs and the Tempest - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Love the tempest buff. Ishtar needs to not be able to use battle ship weapons. that is its main issue unless you plan to let the vaga use battleship guns. for god sakes stop nerfing supers! come out with the capital changes and be done with it ...
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.06.22 15:42:58
|
6. Sticky:Dev blog: Feedback on the new Overview Brackets - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Cleanse Serce wrote: Quote: We are aware that a sudden and drastic update to some small but very important space symbols may have inherently vaporized several trillions of ISK from the economy. As pilots undocked expecting their familiar foe...
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.06.18 18:34:28
|
7. Sticky:Dev blog: Feedback on the new Overview Brackets - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
i dont understand why we cant have a choice in reverting to the old overview. some of the new shapes and stuff for buildings and deploy-able units is ok but the ship and my god the drone symbols in space are just so cluttered.
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.06.18 18:32:23
|
8. The new messy "brackets" finally coming June 2nd - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
the new icons make large scale pvp so confusing and cluttered you just see icons bunched up they make no sense and don't work. go back to the old icons for ships and drones and use these fancy one for structures
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.06.03 05:54:52
|
9. Sticky:Dev blog: Ship Customization: Time to Show Some SKIN - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Really cool !!!! But I must ask WHERE THE HELL IS THE BLOOD AEON!!!!!! and dont you even think about making it a 30 day skin!!!
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.04.21 20:12:03
|
10. Sticky:Dev blog: Back Into the Structure - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ekaterina 'Ghetto' Thurn wrote: Cr Turist wrote: I think getting rid of the force field could be supplemented with just making it smaller. maybe instead if you made it half a sphere that covers the bottom or top of a structure. this would st...
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.03.21 17:52:44
|
11. Sticky:Dev blog: Back Into the Structure - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I think getting rid of the force field could be supplemented with just making it smaller. maybe instead if you made it half a sphere that covers the bottom or top of a structure. this would still allow bridging in a similar mechanic as we know now...
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.03.21 17:32:57
|
12. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Steve Ronuken wrote: I've had a couple of people asking why I haven't commented. so here's the reason, and comments: Reason: When it comes to Sov, I'm a completely outsider. I can comment on things like people saying 'Large battles are really ...
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.03.04 15:04:02
|
13. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kah'Les wrote: Lord TGR wrote: No pritty sure im right. No, pretty sure it's not supposed to be for the elitist few. Eager, but inexperienced pilots should be able to have a go as well, adding a ship which requires sov into that mix is g...
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.03.04 14:55:33
|
14. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Arrendis wrote: Cr Turist wrote: if you can take space and keep space u can have space it shouldnt take CCP giving it to you. provi is a great example of this they took the space they wanted and they defend it at all cost. Right. If you c...
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.03.04 14:54:46
|
15. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ummm Yes.[/quote] Incorrect.[/quote] No pritty sure im right. [/quote] No, pretty sure it's not supposed to be for the elitist few. Eager, but inexperienced pilots should be able to have a go as well, adding a ship which requires sov into that mi...
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.03.04 14:53:10
|
16. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
AlexKent wrote: Hear that boys? It's the titan prices falling in a cascade of delicious NCdot tears. Also, RIP renter empire, you might wanna merge NA in your alliance so you will be able to protect their space. So much for being elite. u...
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.03.04 14:51:25
|
17. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Arrendis wrote: Cr Turist wrote: Lord TGR wrote: Kah'Les wrote: Linking a ship that takes 30 min to build and cost 100 mill to take sov is even a worse idea. Why? Why shouldn't relatively new and inexperienced people be able to give ...
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.03.04 14:46:02
|
18. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Lord TGR wrote: Cr Turist wrote: Lord TGR wrote: Kah'Les wrote: Linking a ship that takes 30 min to build and cost 100 mill to take sov is even a worse idea. Why? Why shouldn't relatively new and inexperienced people be able to give ...
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.03.04 14:43:36
|
19. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Lord TGR wrote: Kah'Les wrote: Linking a ship that takes 30 min to build and cost 100 mill to take sov is even a worse idea. Why? Why shouldn't relatively new and inexperienced people be able to give it a go in unused/undefended space? Is ...
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.03.04 14:41:23
|
20. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Jessy Andersteen wrote: Cr Turist wrote: i dont know about everyone else but i guess my question can be broken down into two parts about this patch. 1. if you remove structure grinds and reasons to call CTA's how do you plan on giving a rea...
- by Cr Turist - at 2015.03.04 14:03:43
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |